Dealing with complexity in Part
2 of the Speaking exam at Cambridge Certificate in
Advanced English (CAE) level
by Sandra Bradwell
- 1
'Becoming a more effective communicator is
not simply a matter of practising the spoken language; practice
certainly helps, but the real improvements come from planning
how to approach a speaking task and evaluating how well
you spoke' Lynch/Anderson (1992:1) It is also essential
to be in a 'language rich' environment where the teacher's
role is to push learners to complex and varied language
use instead of allowing them to fall back on a very limited
range of expression.
Most students at advanced level can express what they want
and need to say in English. Students who have been to an English-speaking
country can generally speak more fluently and confidently
and have developed a lot of the strategies inherent in normal
conversation because they have had many opportunities for
interacting with people and a greater exposure to English
in a natural setting. Students who have not had this opportunity
need to watch videos, exploit satellite television and radio
broadcasts and maximise opportunities for speaking in the
classroom. For students preparing the CAE exam, it is not
sufficient to have a good command of English, they need to
be trained in and develop skills which are demanding for a
native speaker. Part 2 of the CAE speaking exam requires students
to compare and contrast photos and then speculate or hypothesize
about what people are doing in a minute. 'The inability to
take up long turns in conversation is a feature of many second
language speakers' according to Richards (1990:70). Consequently
a lot of work needs to be done to prepare learners for this
very demanding task.
Let us consider some of the problems.
Environment is the first major problem. Studying three hours
a week in the native country provides little exposure to natural
English. Unless students use English at work, they have to
make a conscious effort to watch films, listen to the news.
It can be difficult for teachers to find resources. Cassettes
or videos accompanying course books provide very few authentic,
unscripted dialogues or conversations. This means a lot of
time and effort needs to be invested to find appropriate materials
and exploit them effectively. Speaking, unlike writing, has
many features which are difficult to record or transcribe
due to its very nature and this complicates the task for the
teacher. For newly qualified teachers it is a huge task.
Another problem is motivation. The higher the level, the
more difficult it is to perceive progress. Learning a language
is hard work and improving speaking skills is a slow process
when students attend class for so few hours a week. It can
be frustrating.
Some personal factors can hinder the learning process: shyness,
lack of confidence, nerves. These can be dealt with in the
right learning environment. However, some students can be
over concerned with accuracy and find it difficult to achieve
fluency, other students can be very fluent and not pay enough
attention to accuracy. The teacher needs to help students
become aware of the handicap of these two extreme behaviours.
Let us move on to specific problems with the skill and
with Part 2 of the speaking exam in particular.
Bygate (1987:3) distinguishes between a student's knowledge
of the language and their skill in using the language. He
goes on to separate skills into 'motor-perceptive skills'
which 'involve perceiving, recalling, and articulating sounds
and structures of the language' and 'interaction skills' which
'involve making decisions about communication: what to say,
how to say it, and whether to develop it, in accordance with
one's intentions, while maintaining the desired relations
with others.'(ibid:6) The nature of speech and the demands
it puts on learners: the time pressures, the grammatical and
lexical choices to be made, the rapid planning and execution
needed to be effective, the role as listener and importance
of understanding, all contribute to the complexity of the
skill. Helping students bridge the gap between 'linguistic
competence' and 'communicative competence' is an extremely
complex task.
Features of pronunciation in the native tongue can cause
problems. Spanish is a syllable-timed language and this often
transfers into English making it sound very jerky. Students
may pause or hesitate too much. This is especially the case
with shy students who speak little or hesitantly in their
own language (Appendix
1). A narrower voice range can sometimes make students
sound uninteresting or uninterested.
Awareness of body language and turn-taking conventions are
also important in communication between people from different
countries, since their cultural expectations and experience
will tend to make them interpret these non-verbal signals
in different ways. It is easy for some students to be considered
rude.
Part 2 of the speaking exam is especially demanding because
of the cognitive demands of the task and the time constraints
imposed. It involves sustaining a 'long turn' for a minute,
with little time to prepare, in exam conditions. Students
need to be capable of using formal spoken discourse, with
complex noun phrases, rich vocabulary and a variety of expressions
in order to make an impact on the examiner. Learners need
to prepare it well.
To
page 2 of 3 of the article
To
the lesson plan
To
a print friendly version
To
the articles index
|